Love and Wrath in the Gospel of Jesus Christ

“Since, therefore, we have now been justified by his blood,
much more shall we be saved by him from the wrath of God.
For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son,
much more, now that we are reconciled, shall we be saved by his life.”
(Romans 5:9-10)

There has been a lot of buzz on the internet recently about the modern hymn, In Christ Alone, which has become one of our favorites in our congregation.  Apparently, while the Presbyterian Church’s Hymnal Committee considered the song because it is being sung in many churches, it was ultimately rejected because of the third stanza which sings:

“Till on that cross as Jesus died/the wrath of God was satisfied.”

The committee had suggested a change in the lyrics to:

as Jesus died, the love of God was magnified

but the writers of the hymn, Keith Getty and Stuart Townend, would not approve the change in language, insisting upon the integrity of the hymn and the Biblical message it teaches through song.

So what’s the big deal about “wrath” anyway?  If you were to make a list of the virtues and characteristics that are valued in our world, wrath would certainly not be one of them.  People who are full of wrath are not the kind of people you want to be around, are they?  So would a wrathful god be a kind of god we want to worship?

We must keep in mind, however, that the ways of God are not the ways of man.  When we are angry and full of wrath, our wrath is stained with sin.  There are often times when anger is justified, but the apostle Paul warns us in our anger not to sin, because it is so easy to do so.

If we talk of the wrath of God, then, we must speak consistently with the nature of God.  God is revealed in His Word as righteous, holy, just, steadfast in love, and yes, at times even, a God of wrath.  In fact, one may even argue that the love of God implies his wrath.  Without his wrath, or shall we say, God’s holy anger, God’s love is nothing more than a Hallmark card sentiment that can be easily scorned.

Think of it this way: if a man is not jealous for his wife’s attention, angered when she gives her affection and adoration to other men, does he really even love his wife?  Dr. Bruce McCormack, theology professor at Princeton Theological Seminary, in his class on The Atonement, spent a good two weeks on the wrath of God.  I pulled out the notes this week (yes, I’ve kept them these 12 years), and found this:

“Wrath is not a characteristic of God; righteousness is.
Wrath is the reaction of God to the scorning of his love.  Wrath is love’s backside.”

When we sin, when we rebel against God’s law and His righteous way for our lives, we scorn the love of God and fall under the wrath of His judgment.  This wrath is reserved for all who have sinned, Ephesians 2:3 tells us “we are by nature children of wrath,” and as Romans teaches, “the wages of sin is death.”  We stand in need of salvation from the wrath of God.

Therefore, without wrath, there is no gospel.  When people talk about the gospel, they like to talk about the Good News of God’s love for us, in that He sent His Son to save us; and Amen to that.  But from what have we been saved?  From our bad thinking?  From our mistakes?  No, we have been saved, ultimately, from the wrath of God.

It was the wrath of God that was poured out on Christ upon the cross.  It was the wrath reserved for us that he bore for us.  Greg Gilbert, in his book “What is the Gospel” writes, “a righteous and holy God can justify the ungodly because in Jesus’ death, mercy and justice were perfectly reconciled.  The curse was righteously executed, and we were mercifully saved.”

It is only because of the cross, where Christ bore the wrath of God, that we now know and live in the love of God.  It is only because He suffered the wrath meant for us that we can sing:

No guilt in life, no fear in death
This is the pow’r of Christ in me;
From life’s first cry to final breath,
Jesus commands my destiny.
No pow’r of hell, no scheme of man,
Can ever pluck me from His hand;
Till He returns or calls me home
Here in the pow’r of Christ I’ll stand.

And so we shall sing!

SDG

A time to study…

Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh..
(Genesis 2:24 (ESV))

Last week the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA) voted on an amendment to change the definition of marriage from “one man and one woman” to “to persons,” a move that would allow ministers in the PC(USA) to perform same-gender marriage.  Surprisingly to everyone, the vote failed – but only barely.  The vote was 308 for and 338 against.  Many in the church today give thanks to God for this act of preserving grace, but are all too aware that the issue will be before the GA again in 2014.

Interestingly, the GA did pass a recommendation for churches and presbyteries to commit to two years of “serious study and discernment” regarding Christian marriage. It is hard to say what will become of this study, other than to further entrench positions on either side of the aisle.  I have a difficult time believing that the Rainbow Stole wearing delegates will be convinced, nor are open to persuasion, that they have been mistaken in their argument for “redefining marriage,” nor do I consider that I could ever be convinced to change my understanding of what I believe the Bible clearly states is God’s intention for marriage.  In a post-modern society where every individual is the final authority on what is real and what is right, is there anyone listening to the forsaken prophet, crying in the wilderness, “Thus sayeth the Lord…”?

Still, having an opportunity to study the meaning of Christian marriage is never a bad thing, and I encourage you to take any opportunity to do so.  I am sure that there will be studies forthcoming from a General Assembly task force, and from para-church organizations – some in favor of the traditional teaching on marriage, some not.  But don’t depend on those sources, study this for yourself.

Try this – starting in Genesis 2, see how marriage was giving as a blessed union between a man and a woman, then look forward through scriptures to see examples of how marriage works.  Sometimes it is broken and dysfunctional – there are patriarchs with multiple wives and concubines, who have adulterous affairs, there are women who are unfaithful to their husbands – all because of the exceeding sinfulness of sin.  But notice also the faithful and committed husbands and wives who demonstrate what marriage ought to be.  Look at what Jesus taught about marriage, notice also how Paul saw marriage as a parable for our relationship as the church with Christ.  Let us develop and Biblical understanding of marriage, then let us allow that understanding to shape and heal our own marriages.

Next, here’s some suggested reading:

The Meaning of Marriage, Tim Keller – I’ve only just started this myself, but I highly recommend it.

The Pittsburgh Declaration on Marriage – read through this and consider signing it yourself.

Theology Matters – May/June edition – One of the best briefs on marriage, considering the arguments for revision, and then presenting a solid argument for the Biblical understanding of marriage.

Foundations for a Curriculum on Marriage, Part I – Mary Naegeli is the Director of the Presbyterian Coalition and writes a great article on the differences of perspective as we enter this season of discussion.

Happy Studies!