How the Holy Spirit Works… (Part 2)

Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God…”
(1 John 4:1 ESV)

A couple of months ago I posed the question, “How does the Holy Spirit work?”  The question was particularly relevant (and remains relevant) as I was about to embark on my first experience at the General Assembly of the PC (USA).  Entrenched advocates for both progressive and traditional views on every issue claimed to have the power and influence of the Holy Spirit.  Nearly every forthcoming decision was said to be the “will of the Spirit,” even those that were passed by very narrow margins. 

I just recently finished the book, A Quest for Godliness: the Puritan Vision of the Christian Life (J.I. Packer), which I had been reading for a pastor’s study group.  Within the discussion on the nature of revival and evangelism within the church, Packer turns to Jonathan Edwards.  The prevailing question of Edwards’ day was the same as ours, “how do we know when the Holy Spirit is moving?”  Edwards preaching brought great revival, but many in his day dismissed the claims that the revival was authentic because of the emotionalism and experimentalism (i.e. experiential) nature of the revival.  To answer his opponents, and following the teaching of 1 John 4:1-6, Edwards distinguished the marks of the work of the Spirit of God as follows:

  1. When the operation is such as to raise their esteem of that Jesus who was born of a Virgin, and was crucified without the gates of Jerusalem; and seems more to confirm and establish their minds in the truth of what the gospel declares to us of his being the Son of God, and the Savior of men; it is a sure sign that it is from the Spirit of God… The devil has the most bitter and implacable enmity against that person, especially in his character of the Savior of men; he would never go about to beget in men more honorable thoughts of him.
  2. When the Spirit that is at work operates against the interests of Satan’s kingdom, which lies in encouraging and establishing sin, and cherishing men’s worldly lusts; this is a sure sign that it is a true, and not a false, spirit… It is not to be supposed that Satan would convince men of sin, and awaken the conscience.
  3. The spirit that operates in such manner, as to cause men a greater regard to the Holy Scriptures, and establishes them more in their truth and divinity, is certainly the Spirit of God… A spirit of delusion will not incline persons to seek direction at the mouth of God.
  4. The spirit operates as a spirit of truth, leading persons to truth, convincing them of those things that are true… that there is a God, and that he is a great and sin-hating God; that life is short, and very uncertain; and that there is another world; that they have immortal souls, and must give account of themselves to God; that they are exceeding sinful by nature and practice; that they are helpless in themselves…
  5. If the spirit that is at work among a people operates as a spirit of love to God and man, it is a sure sign that it is a Spirit of God.

These criteria could be, and ought to be applied to any movement within the church.  Does this program, message, mission, statement, etc., raise our esteem of Jesus and bring others to faith in him?  Does it mortify sin and lust and promote righteousness and truth?  Does it stand in accord with a straightforward and clear understanding of God’s word, and call us to a greater reliance upon Scripture?  Does it lead us to greater truth about God and ourselves, and our ultimate and absolute dependence upon God?  Does it promote love, love to God and to man, a love that is pure and holy?

I Kings and 2 Chronicles both retell the story of the prophet Micaiah.  Micaiah was summoned to King Ahab to tell the king whether he would be successful in battle.  When pressed, Micaiah told Ahab that he would fall in battle, and that the people would be scattered like sheep without a shepherd.  The rest of Ahab’s prophets had given a favorable vision, so Ahab asked why Micaiah was such a trouble maker.  This is his reply:

“I saw the Lord sitting on his throne, and all the host of heaven standing beside him on his right hand and on his left; and the Lord said, ‘Who will entice Ahab, that he may go up and fall at Ramoth-gilead?’ And one said one thing, and another said another.  Then a spirit came forward and stood before the Lord, saying, ‘I will entice him.’   And the Lord said to him, ‘By what means?’ And he said, ‘I will go out, and will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets.’ And he said, ‘You are to entice him, and you shall succeed; go out and do so.’   Now therefore behold, the Lord has put a lying spirit in the mouth of all these your prophets; the Lord has declared disaster for you” (I Kings 22:19-23 ESV).

Judging by the direction our denomination seems intent to take, I am left to wonder if God has not sent out a lying spirit into our midst to entice us.  When a church puts truth on the level with a lie and promotes moral turpitude and humble piety as equally valid options for life, which spirit are we following?

What the church needs now, as much as ever, is an outpouring of the Spirit of God.  We don’t need a spirit of inclusivity.  We don’t need a spirit of peace.  We don’t need a spirit of unity.  While the Holy Spirit surely includes those who have been outcasts; while the Holy Spirit brings peace where there has been enmity; while the Holy Spirit brings unity where there has been division; what we need more than anything else is true communion with God through Jesus Christ our savior in the power of His Holy Spirit.  No judicial action, no legislative position, no assembly’s decision can replace our need for the authentic and powerful presence of God’s Spirit in our church.

May God’s Spirit move upon our church today!

SDG

Out of the mouths of babes… more thoughts from G.A.

“Is it not those inside the church whom you are to judge?  God judges those outside.  Purge the evil person from among you.”
(I Corinthians 5:12-13)

As I mentioned last week, I had the opportunity to attend the General Assembly’s Committee on Church Orders and Ministry as an overture advocate.  On Monday morning, as the committee began to address the business before them, there was a scheduled “Open Session,” an open mike time for anyone with a vested interest in the issues before the committee to share their thoughts.  Each speaker had 90 seconds to speak, and they could say pretty much anything they wanted.  There was a wide range of testimonies, from those advocating the inclusion of all people (including homosexuals) into the ordained ministry to those in favor of maintaining the standards and principles the church has held for centuries.  Everyone spoke passionately from personal experience, and, in my humble opinion, the most powerful testimonies were from those who spoke about how the grace and love of God in Jesus Christ helped them to overcome sin in their lives, including sexual sin.

There was one speaker, however, who really stood out.  He was a 13 year old boy, who, along with a handful of other teens, had organized to speak in favor of repealing the ordination standards to allow all people to serve.  He began by reading from Deuteronomy 21:18-21:

“If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and, though they discipline him, will not listen to them, then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city at the gate of the place where he lives, and they shall say to the elders of his city, ‘This our son is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.’ Then all the men of the city shall stone him to death with stones. So you shall purge the evil from your midst, and all Israel shall hear, and fear. ” (Deuteronomy 21:18–21, ESV)

This young man, with great wit and charm, suggested that it’s a good thing that his parents did not uphold this command, otherwise he wouldn’t be standing before us today.  Logically, he then said that if that Old Testament command was “out of touch” and inapplicable to our lives today, couldn’t we also say the same of the prohibition against homosexuality in the church? 

The problem, however, with his approach, was that he failed to see how this passage addressed the greater, communal nature of sin and its devastating effect on the covenant community of the people of God when left unchecked.  Had he truly understood the passage, he would have known how he had unwittingly made a case against his own position (though I doubt anyone on the committee caught it).

Patrick Miller, Old Testament Professor at Princeton Seminary, wrote about this passage in his commentary on Deuteronomy.  He notes that while this passage seems “barbaric” today, Israel regarded the Fifth Commandment (“honoring your parents”) with the same seriousness as the treatment of God neighbor.

“In the statute concerning the rebellious child, such rebellion is clearly regarded as resistance to divine direction as mediated through parental authority and teaching.  That behavior is not simply a bad thing but is representative of a festering sore in the midst of the people, a corruption that can undo the community’s devotion to its Lord and its continued attention to the Lord’s way… The statute, therefore, bears testimony once again to Deuteronomy’s setting of the love of the Lord and the Lord’s way as not only the highest good but an absolute necessity for the people to live as God’s people and enjoy God’s blessing.  Punishment is not determined by how much explicit harm has been done to individuals but by the depth of the wound to the body politic and religious when the fundamental directions of the Lord’s way are violated” (Miller, Patrick D. Deuteronomy, Interpretation, A Biblical Commentary for Teaching and Preaching, (Louisville, John Knox Press, 1990)pg 167.).

Rather than give Biblical evidence that the Old Testament laws no longer apply, this passage actually testifies to the serious nature of un-confessed and un-repentant sin.  Yes, we are all sinners (hetero- and homo-sexual alike), and we are all deserving of God’s wrath.  We all must cling to and trust in the grace of God in Jesus Christ for our salvation.  None of us has the claim to moral perfection and self-righteousness, our righteousness is found in Christ alone.  But to say that God’s word no longer applies to our lives, to attribute to “God’s will” what scripture univocally calls a sin, is to deny God’s will and His way for our lives.  To take away the church’s ability and authority to lovingly and carefully discipline those who are lost in sin goes against the very nature of our life together.  The blind toleration, or worse, the willful promotion of sin, will rob the church of our mission and ministry.  The love of the Lord and of His way is our highest good and an absolute necessity for us to live as God’s people and to enjoy His blessing.

I am reminded of The Westminster Confession of Faith which teaches that “although true believers be not under the law as a covenant of works, to be thereby justified or condemned; yet is it of great use to them, as well as to others; in that, as a rule of life, informing them of the will of God and their duty, it directs and binds them to walk accordingly; discovering also the sinful pollutions of the nature, hearts, and lives…”  Unfortunately, there was no opportunity to address and correct the gross misunderstanding of God’s word presented by this young man.  There was no instruction regarding the use of the law in the light of the gospel.  Instead, God’s word was mocked and biblical discipline was sneered.  If this is the future of the church, we’ve got a lot of explaining to do.

SDG