Unknown's avatar

About reveds

Occupation: Pastor, Ebenezer Presbyterian Church, Lennox, SD Education: BS - Christian Education, Sterling College; MDiv. - Princeton Theological Seminary Family: Married, with Four children. Hobbies: Running (will someday run a marathon), Sci-Fi (especially Doctor Who and Sherlock), Theater, and anything else my kids will let me do.

In Memory of Dad

Let me begin with an apology.  I have no excuse for not writing anything for my blog since Christmas.  It just didn’t happen.  For those of you (if you’re still out there) who actually read this, I make no promises to write more regularly.  I would like to, but I know myself too well.

Here’s the big news.  It has been one week to the day since my father’s funeral.  My dad, Larry Sayler, passed away on Sunday, March 22nd, from complications resulting from surgery.  His death was sudden and tragic, and he will be missed greatly.

I had the honor to speak on behalf of the family at dad’s funeral.  It was a difficult thing to do, and odd.  Usually, as the Pastor, I can be somewhat disconnected from the raw emotions and grief experienced by those who come to the service.  Not that I am cold and unfeeling, but usually I can maintain some distance which allows me to get through the service and minister to those in need.  Not this time.  And I am really glad that Dr. Marsh, the pastor at Eastminster Presbyterian did such a wonderful job.  My job this time was different.  Rather than help bring our attention to Christ and the promises of His gospel, I got to speak about my dad.  I don’t know how well I did, it’s all just a blur now.  But I thought I’d take a moment to share here some of my thoughts.

When we lose someone close to us, one of the things that we notice is all the stuff they left behind.  As we sort through it, our thoughts turn to what we stand to inherit, and what we have already received.  My brother and sister and I have been given so much from my father (both good and bad), and I thought I’d share with you just a few of those things.

I would like to blame some of my poorer attributes on my dad – would like to, but I can’t.  Dad could be stubborn, when he made up his mind, there was no moving him.  No matter how much his doctors said pushed diet and exercise, dad wouldn’t.  I see in myself some of these same characteristics, and while I’d like to say that’s his fault, I know well and good whose responsible here.

But one thing I can say is that I have inherited dad’s sense of humor (or lack thereof).  The first time Dr. Marsh (who I knew from Sterling College) preached at Eastminster, my dad, who was a member there, came to Dr. Marsh after the service and said, “I believe you know Ethan Sayler.”  To which Dr. Marsh replied positively.  Then my dad said, “I live with his mom.”  Silence.  That was how my dad introduced himself.  His favorite movies was “Dr. Strangelove: Or How I learned to stop worrying and love the bomb” and he and I would stay up late to watch Dr. Who.  If you know either of the two, you will understand my dad a lot better (and me).

I have also inherited many qualities of my father that have made me a better man. 

I have been overwhelmed by the number of people who have come by, called, or have written in the time since my dad’s death to say how dear a friend my dad had been to them.  If dad considered you a friend, you knew it, and he would go to great ends to help you with anything you needed.  To a fault, dad would give of his time, money, and wisdom to help a friend in any situation.  He was a fierce and loyal friend, and I pray that I can be that kind of friend to those God has placed around me.

Dad was also a man of great faith.  When I was younger, I didn’t understand this.  When I was in High School, it kind of put me off – all those old books and old ways of thinking.  But now I understand how rich and deep his faith ran.  He loved Scripture, and had a daily walk with God through the study of His Word.  Dad and I really connected when I was in seminary.  He loved those conversations when I’d call to talk about what we were studying.  Often, I’d email him at midnight a copy of a paper for him to proof-read, and he’d have it back to me in about 30 minutes.

He loved reading Barnhouse, Boyce, and even Calvin.  He was a Five-Point Calvinist, and he knew his salvation rested in God’s grace alone.  And dad loved the old hymns, didn’t care much for the new praise music, for him it lacked substance and meaning.  That was dad.

Ultimately, dad was a loving and devoted husband and father.  He never missed a concert, game, performance that Aaron, Amanda, or I were in.  At every cross country and track meet, which had to be the most boring things to watch, dad was there, with his orange hat, cheering us on.  He was incredibly proud of his children (and their spouses), and wasn’t embarrassed to brag about them to everyone.  And then he had grandchildren.  All TWELVE of them.  They were his joy and delight, and he loved every moment he had with them.

That was dad.  Even with all his bad jokes and stubborn ways, he was a man of loyal friendship, profound faith, and great devotion to his family.  You might have been blessed to know him, but we were definitely blessed to have him as a father.  As we remember dad, let us carry with him the very best of who he was. 

SDG

In the Fullness of Time

In Paul’s condensed version of the Christmas story (Galatians 4:4-5) he uses a curious phrase, “In the fullness of time.”  I’ve often wondered about this.

In the Greek, this word “fullness” suggests a completion, or the end of a period of time, when all intended within it has been accomplished.  In other words, when everything that needed to happen before Christ’s coming had taken place, then God sent His son.  The ESV Study bible commentary says, “God sent his Son at the right moment in human history, when God’s providential oversight of the events of the world had directed and prepared peoples and nations for the incarnation and ministry of Christ, and for the proclamation of the Gospel.”

Scholars have suggested several reasons why this was the “fullness of time” in historical perspective:

W      Because the Babylonian captivity had purged Israel from idolatry and at least they were focusing on the true God and looking for the Messiah, and so Israel, the people to whom the Messiah first must come, were not engulfed in idolatry but were looking at the true God even if through their own skewed vision and were looking for the Messiah. 

W      The canon of the Old Testament had been well-established; the prophecies were laid down; the synagogues had been established so there would be places to go to preach the Gospel to people who at least ostensibly were seeking to know the true God in Israel. 

W      Alexander the Great had spread the Greek language over the whole known world, certainly the Biblical world, so that everybody spoke Greek, so that the scriptures could be in the New Testament, written in a language that would be understood by everyone. 

W      Romans with their powerful Pax Romana had brought peace out of diverse cultures and built roads everywhere so that easy access both from the standpoint of travel and from the standpoint of authority would be available for missionaries spreading this Gospel. 

All that being said, I can’t help but wonder about the possibilities if Christ had come today.  I remember getting cable when I was a kid, we had a whopping 13 channels, and we were really excited because we could get WGN out of Chicago.  Oh the days wasted watching “Bozo the Clown”.  Now, we’ve got the Dish Network with a couple hundred channels (and still nothing to watch).  We’ve got newspapers, radio, internet, Facebook, blogs, YouTube and viral videos… with just a little talent and the right online connections, your name could be known around the world tomorrow – remember the “numa numa” guy.  In Jesus Christ Superstar, Judas asks Jesus, “Why’d you choose such a backward time in such a strange land?  If you’d come today you could have reached a whole nation.  Israel in 4 BC had no mass communication.”  With all we’ve got going for ourselves, wouldn’t today have been the fullness of time?

A friend of mine directed me an article titled “Your iBrain” in the October/November edition of Scientific American Mind, which reports

“Our high tech revolution has plunged us into a state of “continuous partial attention,” which is described as continually staying busy – keeping tabs on everything while never truly focusing on anything.  We scan for an opportunity for any type of contact at every given moment.  [And so we] exist in a sense of constant crisis – on alert for a new contact or bit of exciting news or information at any moment.  Once people get used to this state, they tend to thrive on the perpetual connectivity.  It feeds their ego and sense of self-worth and it becomes irresistible.  The pathways for human interaction and communication weaken as customary one-on-one people skills atrophy.  Although having all our pals online from moment to moment seems intimate, we risk losing personal touch with our real-life relationship and may experience an artificial sense of intimacy as compared with when we shut down our devices and devote our attention to one individual at a time.

Perhaps this is why God sent His son as a child, in a manger, so long ago.  With all the online connectivity we have, what we really long for is a personal connection, what we desire is to have our worth affirmed, to be highly esteemed for who we are, what we need is someone who knows us and understands us and can save us from our sins.  We need God with us – not some digital messiah, but a real and personal savior who is all in all.

So Paul says in Galatians 4, “when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son, born of woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, so that we might receive adoption as sons.”  Jesus wasn’t made, He was sent forth.  He always existed in the presence of God (John 1) as the second person of the Trinity.  Yet at the same time, He was born of a woman, He was fully man. In order to save us He had to be God, for only God can overpower sin and death and hell.  In order to save us he had to be man because only man can substitute for man and die man’s death.  He had to be God and man, God to give His sacrifice infinite value, to bear our sins in his own body.

God sent us His son so that we might receive adoption as the children of God.  1 John 3:1 says “See what kind of love the Father has given to us, that we should be called children of God; and so we are.”  What an amazing privilege, what a spectacular gift!  Our adoption into God’s family points us to the overwhelming joy and assurance of knowing we have a Father who loves us and a family with whom we share and enjoy our new life in Christ.  The meaning of Christmas could be summed up in this: Jesus came as the Son of Man that we could become the sons and daughters of God.

May this news fill you with joy and peace this Christmas!

SDG